Old Rack - Revision history

Adj: moved Rack to Old Rack

2012-08-06T16:41:46Z

← Older revision

Revision as of 16:41, 6 August 2012

2012-08-06T16:41:28Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 16:41, 6 August 2012
Line 1:		Line 1:
	An old HP rack ~~holds~~ most of the FnordNet gear. Thanks to [http://www.agnosticjihad.com/ agnosticj] for the hardware donation.		An old HP rack held most of the FnordNet gear. Thanks to [http://www.agnosticjihad.com/ agnosticj] for the hardware donation. This rack has been gifted to dougr.

	It's 21U tall and ~~has~~ funny upright supports that make it difficult to put modern rack-mount rails into.		It was 21U tall and had funny upright supports that make it difficult to put modern rack-mount rails into.

	{\|-		{\|-
Line 128:		Line 128:
	\|currently off		\|currently off
	\|}		\|}

	I should put a picture of it here some day. Also, I'm pretty well out of Discordian characters from the Principia to name things after. Will need to think on that. Also, also, I need more power outlets. Damn, why is life so hard?

2012-06-21T20:31:05Z

2012-05-21T16:56:27Z

2012-05-16T20:47:53Z

@@ Line 102: / Line 102: @@
 |-
 |3
 |-
 |2
 |-
 |1
 |}

2012-05-09T20:07:53Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:07, 9 May 2012
Line 36:		Line 36:
	\|-		\|-
	\|17		\|17
			\|
			\|Seagate
			\|DockStar
			\|
			\|
			\|
			\|the three Seagate Dockstars sit here, atop sacredchao at elevation 16
	\|-		\|-
	\|16		\|16

2012-05-03T15:51:29Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:51, 3 May 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	It's 21U tall and has funny upright supports that make it difficult to put modern rack-mount rails into.		It's 21U tall and has funny upright supports that make it difficult to put modern rack-mount rails into.

	All of the elevations might be off by one (too high.) This table was written from memory. And I don't remember if there's a gap between the topmost switch and the top of the rack.

	{\|-		{\|-
Line 16:		Line 14:
	\|-		\|-
	\|21		\|21
		⚫	\|-
			\|20
	\|back		\|back
	\|Force10		\|Force10
Line 24:		Line 24:
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|20		\|19
	\|-		\|-
	\|19		\|18
	\|back		\|back
	\|Force10		\|Force10
Line 35:		Line 35:
	\|currently off		\|currently off
	\|-		\|-
	\|18		\|17
	\|
	\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|17		\|16
	\|front-back		\|front-back
	\|Dell		\|Dell
Line 48:		Line 46:
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|16		\|15
	\|front-back		\|front-back
	\|IBM		\|IBM
Line 57:		Line 55:
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|15		\|14
	\|
	\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|14		\|13
	\|front-back		\|front-back
	\|Dell		\|Dell
Line 70:		Line 66:
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|~~13-~~12		\|12-11
	\|front-back		\|front-back
	\|Hewlett-Packard		\|Hewlett-Packard
Line 79:		Line 75:
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|~~11-~~10		\|10-9
	\|front-back		\|front-back
	\|Dell		\|Dell
Line 86:		Line 82:
	\|2U wintel server		\|2U wintel server
	\|vanvanmojo		\|vanvanmojo
	\|
⚫	\|-
	\|9
	\|
	\|		\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|8		\|8
	\|
	\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|7		\|7
	\|
	\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|6		\|6
	\|
	\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|5		\|5
	\|
	\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|4		\|4
	\|
	\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|3		\|3
	\|
	\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|2		\|2
	\|
	\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|1		\|1
	\|
	\|
	\|}		\|}

2012-05-03T15:47:17Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 15:47, 3 May 2012
Line 33:		Line 33:
	\|48 port gigabit Ethernet switch		\|48 port gigabit Ethernet switch
	\|		\|
			\|currently off
	\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|18		\|18

2012-05-02T20:10:36Z

2012-05-02T20:04:07Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:04, 2 May 2012
Line 2:		Line 2:

	It's 21U tall and has funny upright supports that make it difficult to put modern rack-mount rails into.		It's 21U tall and has funny upright supports that make it difficult to put modern rack-mount rails into.

			All of the elevations might be off by one (too high.) This table was written from memory. And I don't remember if there's a gap between the topmost switch and the top of the rack.

	{\|-		{\|-
Line 10:		Line 12:
	!Serial number		!Serial number
	!Description		!Description
			!hostname
	!Notes		!Notes
	\|-		\|-
Line 17:		Line 20:
	\|S50		\|S50
	\|DE4543035		\|DE4543035
	\|48 port gigabit Ethernet switch		\|48 port gigabit Ethernet switch
			\|theforce10switch
	\|might be at elevation 20
			\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|20		\|20
Line 28:		Line 32:
	\|		\|
	\|48 port gigabit Ethernet switch		\|48 port gigabit Ethernet switch
			\|
	\|might be at elevation 18
			\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|18		\|18
Line 40:		Line 45:
	\|FD5RMF1		\|FD5RMF1
	\|1U wintel server		\|1U wintel server
			\|sacredchao
	\|might be at elevation 16
			\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|16		\|16
Line 48:		Line 54:
	\|		\|
	\|1U wintel server (machine type 8647)		\|1U wintel server (machine type 8647)
			\|hungmung
	\|might be at elevation 15
			\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|15		\|15
Line 60:		Line 67:
	\|1G5RMF1		\|1G5RMF1
	\|1U wintel server		\|1U wintel server
			\|gulik
	\|might be at elevation 13
			\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|13		\|13
Line 68:		Line 76:
	\|		\|
	\|2U PA-RISC server		\|2U PA-RISC server
			\|billanddave
	\|might be at elevation 12
			\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|12		\|12
Line 80:		Line 89:
	\|		\|
	\|2U wintel server		\|2U wintel server
			\|vanvanmojo
	\|might be at elevation 10
			\|
	\|-		\|-
	\|10		\|10
Line 122:		Line 132:
	\|		\|
	\|}		\|}

			I should put a picture of it here some day.